瞿宛文的部落格反思經濟學
PIIE: How to Fix Economic Inequality?
An Overview of Policies for the United States and Other High-Income Economies PIIE, 2021/3/10 This guide draws together research from the world’s leading experts on inequality trends and causes within countries and a list of available policy options to mitigate the growing gap (mostly for the United States, with lessons applicable to other advanced countries). […]
江小涓：我的导师周叔莲先生及老一代中国经济学家
江小涓 罗立彬经济人生 2021/3/4 https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?__biz=MjM5NTE2NDAwNg==&mid=2451856306&idx=1&sn=943c6a38c3bd0331ddf3bbc57d4fd3c9&chksm=b12c41bb865bc8ad2cf80522a42eb37fe010a54ed164993c2b760bd059d02e9a47fb1c0bb965&mpshare=1&scene=1&srcid=03047WngFspsDxY35M9PwnFk&sharer_sharetime=1615002510764&sharer_shareid=f14234539e09a08e77a9206f4cc494e3&exportkey=AjiRI17dgpLUbfR5kgtPfeQ%3D&pass_ticket=8n4dmqhFRrqgVx4xmIxnu2A1ZYr2xtx7im6%2FWpWrSKIZ0jASRXKS%2FpPg%2BGzxvXq7&wx_header=0#rd
历史制度主义与路径依赖
原创 政文观止 政文观止Poliview 2021/3/5 https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?__biz=MzI5ODY0MTQ1OA==&mid=2247489116&idx=1&sn=547bc2b77337e49965343a122f3cc503&chksm=eca3e701dbd46e17559a3d53cc206f378d9810a9fd0bdadc6802039fea8c0d5d6c1eb1220627&mpshare=1&scene=1&srcid=0305IF20OFDPt1JYta7hCLon&sharer_sharetime=1614922223332&sharer_shareid=f14234539e09a08e77a9206f4cc494e3&exportkey=AsDuAGKjeHNTp%2BgUmLZGcik%3D&pass_ticket=fKpoNLUMF7syWh8lX2h%2BnaCprrGiGvZ0ecAYLR13t%2FvbWAPRZV2ZzeOp3Rg1sl0S&wx_header=0#rd 在政治学语境下，“路径依赖”这一重要概念经常和历史制度主义结合在一起，本次给大家分享的是与之相关的几篇重要文献。
Krugman: Too Much Choice Is Hurting America
Learning from subprime, health care and electricity. By Paul Krugman NYT, March 1, 2021 Dan Patrick, the lieutenant governor of Texas, is clearly what my father would have called a piece of work. Early in the pandemic he made headlines by saying that older Americans should be willing to risk death so that younger people […]
重述大分流：市场整合历程与长时段经济演进史｜罗曼·施图德
罗曼·施图德 勿食我黍 2021/3/2 作者｜罗曼·施图德（Roman Studer） https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?__biz=Mzg5MjAwNDU4Mg==&mid=2247495837&idx=1&sn=e36fa3c99ae592a751b61ea6115e3908&chksm=cfc60114f8b1880219681153da46e9448369ac895a59b78fcb4115238836c637489459b82cce&mpshare=1&scene=1&srcid=0302mLOTfmUIYU6xJmoVhcWw&sharer_sharetime=1614679094061&sharer_shareid=f14234539e09a08e77a9206f4cc494e3&exportkey=Al0cxD%2FvFusqZdX7efvxGpM%3D&pass_ticket=YIXtunp8R3I5e%2FDRMWYAqqq%2FciUmsr9hlVJ9ZHnA5PhIgjYj8XT1pecIyJW%2BoRte&wx_header=0#rd 本文选编自《大分流重探：欧洲、印度与全球经济强权的兴起》，注释从略，题目为编者所拟. 直觉地说，“斯密式增长”这个概念非常有说服力，能在学界和政界广为接受，也可以理解。如果经济发展与市场范围的大小有明确关系，我们就应确切知道，历史上的大部分时刻，要素市场的范围有多大、产品能拓展到哪些范围，以及这些事如何影响发展。可惜实情并非如此。市场在何时，以及如何整合起来?市场范围的扩大，能否促进增长？又是在何时、在怎样的情况下，促进了增长？这些经验证据其实非常残缺，即使有也模糊难辨。